Sabtu, 27 Agustus 2011

The City Of Mecca : Centre Of Trade And Religion











Although
the 6th-century client states were the largest
Arab polities
of their day, it was not from them that
a permanently
signifi cant Arab state arose. Rather, it
emerged among
independent Arabs living in Mecca at
the junction of
major north–south and west–east
routes, in one of the less naturally favoured Arab settlements of the Hejaz (al-Hijaz). The
development of a
trading town
into a city-state was not unusual, but,
unlike many other western Arabian settlements, Mecca was
not centred on an oasis or located in the hinterland
of any non-Arab power. Although it had enough well water and springwater to provide
for large numbers
of camels, it
did not have enough for agriculture; its
economy depended on long-distance as well as
shortdistance
trade.





Mecca Under the
Quraysh Clans





Sometime after the year 400 CE Mecca had come under the control of a group of Arabs who
were in the process
of becoming sedentary; they were known as Quraysh and were led by a man remembered as Qusayy ibn Kilab (called al-Mujammi‘, “the Unifier”).
During the generations
before Muhammad’s birth in about 570, the several clans of the Quraysh fostered a development in Mecca that seems to have been occurring in
a few other Arab
towns as well.
They used their trading connections and
their relationships with their Bedouin cousins to make their town a regional centre whose
influence radiated in
many directions. They designated Mecca as a quarterly haram, a safe haven from the intertribal warfare and raiding that was endemic among the Bedouin. Thus, Mecca became an attractive site for
large trade fairs
that coincided
with pilgrimage (Arabic:
hajj) to a local shrine, the Ka‘bah. The Ka‘bah housed
the deities of
visitors as well
as the Meccans’ supra-tribal creator and
covenant-guaranteeing deity, called Allah. Most Arabs probably viewed this deity as one
among many,
possessing
powers not specific to a particular tribe;
others may have identified this figure with the God of the Jews and Christians.





The building activities of the Quraysh threatened one non-Arab power enough to invite
direct interference: the
Abyssinians are said to have invaded Mecca in the year of Muhammad’s birth. But the Byzantines
and Sasanians
were distracted
by internal reorganization and renewed
conflict; simultaneously the Yemeni kingdoms were declining. Furthermore, these shifts
in the international
balance of power may have dislocated existing tribal connections enough to make Mecca an attractive
new focus
for supra-tribal
organization, just as Mecca’s equidistance
from the major powers protected its independence and neutrality.





The Meccan link between shrine and market has a broader significance in the history
of religion. It is reminiscent
of changes that had taken place with the emergence of complex societies across the settled world several millennia earlier. Much of the
religious life of the tribal
Arabs had the characteristics of small-group, or “primitive,” religion, including the sacralization
of group-specific natural
objects and phenomena and the multifarious presence of spirit beings, known among the Arabs as jinn. Where more-complex settlement patterns had developed, however, widely shared deities had already
emerged, such as
the “trinity” of
Allah’s “daughters” known as al-Lat, Manat,
and al-‘Uzza. Such qualified simplification and
inclusivity,
wherever they
have occurred in human history, seem to
have been associated with other fundamental changes— increased settlement, extension and
intensification of trade,
and the emergence of lingua francas and other cultural commonalties, all of which had been occurring in
central
Arabia for
several centuries.





New Social Patterns Among the Meccans and Their Neighbours





The sedentarization of the Quraysh and their efforts
to
create an
expanding network of cooperative Arabs generated
social stresses that demanded new patterns of behaviour. The ability of the Quraysh
to solve their problems
was affected by an ambiguous relationship between sedentary and migratory Arabs. Tribal Arabs could go
in
and out of
sedentarization easily, and kinship ties often
transcended lifestyles. The sedentarization of the
Quraysh
did not involve
the destruction of their ties with the
Bedouin or their idealization of Bedouin life. Thus,
for
example, did
wealthy Meccans, thinking Mecca unhealthy,
often send their infants to Bedouin foster mothers.
Yet
the settling of
the Quraysh at Mecca was no ordinary
instance of sedentarization. Their commercial success produced a society unlike that of the Bedouin and
unlike
that of many
other sedentary Arabs. Whereas stratification
was minimal among the Bedouin, a hierarchy based on wealth appeared among the Quraysh.
Although a
Bedouin group
might include a small number of outsiders,
such as prisoners of war, Meccan society was markedly diverse, including non-Arabs as well
as Arabs, slave as well
as free. Among the Bedouin, lines of protection for in-group members were clearly drawn; in Mecca,
sedentarization
and
socioeconomic stratification had begun to blur family
responsibilities and foster the growth of an oligarchy whose economic objectives could
easily supersede other
motivations and values. Whereas the Bedouin acted in


and
through groups and even regularized intergroup raiding
and warfare as a way of life, Meccans needed to act in their own interest and to minimize
conflict by institutionalizing
new, broader social alliances and interrelationships.





The market-shrine complex encouraged surrounding tribes to put aside their conflicts
periodically and to visit
and worship the deities of the Ka‘bah; but such worship, as in most complex societies, could
not replace either the
particularistic worship of small groups or the competing religious practices of other regional
centres, such as
al-Ta’if.





Very little in the Arabian environment favoured the formation of stable large-scale
states. Therefore, Meccan
efforts at centralization and unification might well have been transient, especially because
they were not reinforced
by any stronger power and because they depended almost entirely on the prosperity of a trade route that had
been
formerly
controlled at its southern terminus and could be
controlled elsewhere in the future, or exclude Mecca entirely. The rise of the Meccan
system also coincided
with the spread of the confessional religions, through immigration, missionization, conversion, and foreign
interference.
Alongside
members of the confessional religions
were unaffiliated monotheists, known as hanifs, who distanced themselves from the Meccan religious system by repudiating the old gods but
embracing neither Judaism
nor Christianity. Eventually in Mecca and elsewhere a few individuals came to envision the
possibility of effecting
supra-tribal association through a leadership role common to the confessional religions, that
is, prophethood or
messengership. The only such individual who succeeded in effecting broad social changes was a member of the Hashim (Hashem) clan of Quraysh named
Muhammad
ibn ‘Abd Allah
ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib. One of their own, he
accomplished what the Quraysh had started, first by


working
against them, later by working with them. When
he was born, around 570, the potential for pan-Arab
unification
seemed nil, but
after he died, in 632, the first
generation of his followers were able not only to maintain pan-Arab unification but also to
expand far beyond the
peninsula.





Islamic history / edited by Laura S.
Etheredge
. Britannica Educational Publishing


(a trademark
of Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.)
: New
York
.











Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar